RE: California ban on high capacity magazines declared unconstitutional
March 30, 2019 at 3:09 pm
(This post was last modified: March 30, 2019 at 3:20 pm by Brian37.)
(March 30, 2019 at 2:41 pm)Yonadav Wrote: I don't like the left/right labels when we are talking about libtards and trumptards. Neither has any respect for the rule of law or the constitution. Neither believes in free speech and both have assaulted the media.
You keep using the word "libtard" as if we are legally obligated to accept it as a slur, and as such since you use it, we are bad people just because we don't agree with you.
Call us what you want. But I am a liberal, and your baggage does not constitute and emergency on my part.
(March 30, 2019 at 1:50 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: That would be the NSSF. The NRA isn't the sales or industry lobby. They're a political lobby, kingmakers, they thrive off notoriety.
The sales and industry lobby thrives off anonymity.
Fine, but that only means we should go after both. I think it is wrong to say the NRA has nothing to do with gun sales. They don't sell guns themselves but like you said, they still are king makers whom deal with the political issue regarding firearm laws.
This NSSF lobby is still a lobby regardless. They'd be the Mafia Don, head of the snake, so to speak, but it still would make the NRA more like made man under that Don.
So maybe the argument you should make is, "Don't just focus on the NRA, also at the same time focus on the NSSF". i still would not say it is a good idea to ignore the political lobby NRA. Both that lobby and the industry NSSF are still protecting the same industry.
