(April 14, 2019 at 2:46 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(April 14, 2019 at 12:01 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Your study shows one year.
CDC study - 6 years.
Which is usually more accurate? A larger or smaller study group?
The 2018 study comes with numbers. Are we really quibbling over how many dead kids, as a percent, we need to conclude that a deadly firearm shouldn't be in their environment?
I'm gonna go with a pretty obvious number. . . zero. Zero is the right number of kids who should die due to accidental or deliberate firing of a gun.
I mean. . . guns are a tool designed to put a hole in people. Kids are people, and an upsetting number of them got holes put through their little bodies last year. This is is order to defend against. . . what, exactly? What number of people do you believe had their lives saved by guns last year?
Obstreperous Loutish Belligerent will do nothing but quibble. He has nothing else. Not the gun culture's best spokescritter.
