RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 5, 2019 at 2:24 am
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2019 at 2:25 am by Nay_Sayer.)
(August 5, 2019 at 2:10 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:(August 5, 2019 at 2:06 am)Nay_Sayer Wrote: You have my deepest sympathies. It would appear the good lord FSM did not bless this one with any grey matter.
The rules don't seem to mention anything about giving an intro post; perhaps such a rule has been misplaced elsewhere in the forum?
(August 5, 2019 at 2:09 am)Grandizer Wrote: Inductive reasoning will always fail to account for a "black swan" somewhere (if there is any). Doesn't mean it's a mistake. After all, there doesn't have to be a black swan. And given what we do know, we do have the best explanation for diversity of life on this planet. Do you have a better one? If so, let's hear it.
At one point, epicycles was the best explanation for planetary motion.
It's customary. Unless your M.O is to run into random forums flailing your arms around.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
![[Image: s-l640.jpg]](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DjAAAOSwpIhe1HCM/s-l640.jpg)
Conservative trigger warning.
