Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[Abaddon_ire]

Really? You are the one claiming that evolution must have some "goal". You have neither justified that claim nor stated what that goal might be. All you have is some vague handwaving about something unidentified. What is anyone else to make of that? Allah? Zeus? Thor? What?

I don't know if I've used the word goal, perhaps I did. I thought I've used the terms destination, states of rest, homeostasis, balance, equilibrium, etc. But my memory is faulty, so maybe I did use the word goal.

Nope, that was MY word. You preferred the word "destination".

So pony up. What is the "destination"? Can you tell me? Or not?

ETA: Funny how he is quibbling about "goal" and "destination". Almost as if he thinks semantics are sufficient to make his god real.