Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[Nay_Sayer]

And yet here you are continuing to ignore the other eleven. Quite a chuckle indeed

---

No that is not how it works.

You are supposed to get him all the links so he can flippantly dismiss them for arbitrary reasons.

Well LadyofCamus said I'm free to use google and find a site thats more to my liking. I choose this one.

And no, not all the links. Just the one's he's read so we can be on the same page. Seems like a rather reasonable request.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/...f1f4679e11

and to be specific

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1...10.02210.x

Also, these are peer-reviewed.  Undoubtedly your objections have the same veracity and have been published or likely going to be with what I assume are airtight arguments to the contrary.


Here is another dealing with transitional fossils. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1...10.02039.x

In short.  FSM wept.