(October 9, 2019 at 3:27 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(October 9, 2019 at 3:20 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: As far as I'm concerned they can do what they want with their products.
Not the fucking point.
In a perfect world, politics, religion and economics would not matter.
Dicks was not right because they wanted money, they were right because they realized the amount of firearm violence was not profitable.
(October 9, 2019 at 3:40 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:I wouldn't say least likely; As far as The United States goes(October 9, 2019 at 3:27 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Not the fucking point.
In a perfect world, politics, religion and economics would not matter.
Dicks was not right because they wanted money, they were right because they realized the amount of firearm violence was not profitable.
So they got rid of the weapons LEAST likely to kill people?
I guess that's "Poetlogical".....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shoot...ted_States
Of the 26 incidents listed 12 involved semi-automatic rifles.
A more accurate description would be they are comparable to any other given gun/rifle/shotguns.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
![[Image: s-l640.jpg]](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DjAAAOSwpIhe1HCM/s-l640.jpg)
Conservative trigger warning.
