(January 20, 2020 at 6:14 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ten...t-n1118811
Gun Rights Activist plan on showing up at capital -with guns - and the governor shits himself - imposing a state of emergency and banning guns from the capital grounds.
Meanwhile - more than twice as many gun rights activists showed up armed and stayed armed. -outside the capital grounds. (The control group)
Nothing happened. One girl got arrested for wearing a bandana..... Horrifying crime that...
So explain to me why these politicians are peeing themselves over civilians owning guns?
It seems like a better question would be, ‘Why are law-abiding gun owners shitting themselves over proposed laws that aren’t going to affect them?’
According to the article, the three proposed laws are universal background checks, banning military-style rifles, and temporarily removing guns from the possession of people determined to be a danger to themselves or others.
If you’re law abiding, you won’t have any trouble passing a background check.
If you’re law abiding, why do you need a military type weapon (to be fair, the article wasn’t specific about what this would entail)?
If you’re law abiding, how do you reasonably object to taking guns away from someone who posted about shooting up a school?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
