(January 20, 2020 at 6:56 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:(January 20, 2020 at 6:52 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It seems like a better question would be, ‘Why are law-abiding gun owners shitting themselves over proposed laws that aren’t going to affect them?’In his bizarro world laws shouldn't exist if criminals won't obey them but law abiding people will
According to the article, the three proposed laws are universal background checks, banning military-style rifles, and temporarily removing guns from the possession of people determined to be a danger to themselves or others.
If you’re law abiding, you won’t have any trouble passing a background check.
If you’re law abiding, why do you need a military type weapon (to be fair, the article wasn’t specific about what this would entail)?
If you’re law abiding, how do you reasonably object to taking guns away from someone who posted about shooting up a school?
Boru
According to the article, at least some of the people at the protest are potential criminals, given their slogan, ‘We will not comply.’
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
