Gun Control Crowd Safer? - and a control group

[LadyForCamus]

It seems like a better question would be, ‘Why are law-abiding gun owners shitting themselves over proposed laws that aren’t going to affect them?’

According to the article, the three proposed laws are universal background checks, banning military-style rifles, and temporarily removing guns from the possession of people determined to be a danger to themselves or others.

If you’re law abiding, you won’t have any trouble passing a background check.

If you’re law abiding, why do you need a military type weapon (to be fair, the article wasn’t specific about what this would entail)?

If you’re law abiding, how do you reasonably object to taking guns away from someone who posted about shooting up a school?

Boru

Your definition of "military type weapon" is way too loose for any gun owner.
My AR-15 took 6 deer this season. It's design allows even my 110 lbs sister to comfortably fire it.
Let's go through your posessions - and we will see how much you "need" those...
.....
Snd I see you didn't address the OP...
You just trotted out some kids.....
And ones that haf nothing to do with this rally...

Boru’s post had everything to do with the OP. The point is the rally is stupid and unnecessary in the first place. As far as your “experiment” goes, one question is: can it be repeated? What if we repeated this experiment twelve times, and nine out of the twelve times a person from the “gun” group shot someone? Data of that nature paints a completely different picture, doesn’t it? You haven’t proved anything, and your grasp on how researchers collect and analyze data is rather tenuous if you think it does.