(January 20, 2020 at 7:00 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(January 20, 2020 at 6:52 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It seems like a better question would be, ‘Why are law-abiding gun owners shitting themselves over proposed laws that aren’t going to affect them?’Your definition of "military type weapon" is way too loose for any gun owner.
According to the article, the three proposed laws are universal background checks, banning military-style rifles, and temporarily removing guns from the possession of people determined to be a danger to themselves or others.
If you’re law abiding, you won’t have any trouble passing a background check.
If you’re law abiding, why do you need a military type weapon (to be fair, the article wasn’t specific about what this would entail)?
If you’re law abiding, how do you reasonably object to taking guns away from someone who posted about shooting up a school?
Boru
My AR-15 took 6 deer this season. It's design allows even my 110 lbs sister to comfortably fire it.
Let's go through your posessions - and we will see how much you "need" those...
.....
Snd I see you didn't address the OP...
You just trotted out some kids.....
And ones that haf nothing to do with this rally...
1. I didn’t define ‘military type weapon’. I took exception to the article for not defining it.
2. I did address the OP.
3. I never mentioned kids.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
