RE: Gun Control Crowd Safer? - and a control group
January 21, 2020 at 12:06 am
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2020 at 12:08 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Lol...Yes really
Really.
Quote:Yet SOMEHOW - .you conclude with no evidence whatsoever - that.your solutions lie in more gun control.As opposed to the fallacious conclusions you make

Quote:You have no test samples
You commit the fallacy of samples and even worst irrelevant samples which don't back your point .Which are as good a nothing
Quote:no control groupsNeither do you .You just claim it's control group though i fails as such
Quote:- nothing but anectdotal evidence (frequently contradictory) of different unconnected eventsIrony on steroids
Quote:- and you just "know" that all we need to do is deny those unsavory gun owners their rights and things will be better.And you just know the minds and motivations of your opposition as well as all he other baseless conspiracy crap you spew
Quote:Funny how that works.Yes it's funny how you project your failings onto other people
Quote:Sounds an awful lot like "faith" to.me.Your gun religion is indeed faith
(January 20, 2020 at 10:09 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:But in his mind he's the master of science(January 20, 2020 at 8:02 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Absolutely.
Gun shows in Michigan routinely have between 10 and 20,000 people go through them.
While you are not supposed to carry in a gun show - it's common knowledge that at least half the people there are carrying. Not to mention that there are guns and ammo EVERYWHERE...if somebody decided to kill some people - it would happen.
There is over a 100 shows a year at different venues - and the have been going on for over 75 years.
There has never been an incident to my knowledge - and I have asked.
This wasn't the exception.
It's the rule.
A gun show is not a protest. I don’t think you understand how repeatability in scientific research works. Just because you used the word “control” doesn’t mean you’ve necessarily describing a clinical trial, OB. What you provided was an anecdote, and nothing more.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM