(October 25, 2020 at 12:59 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:And of course that translates perfectly from a well equipped army to a lone individual - much as a supercharger off a Peterbuilt translates onto a skateboard.(October 25, 2020 at 12:48 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: If rate of fire were irrelevant, infantry squads wouldn't carry two belt fed guns. It's completely rational to assert that a more dangerous weapon deserves more stringent legal requirements. A drivers license won't qualify you to drive a semi and I doubt that the legal difference between a semi and a car is their relative amount of inherent evil. The same is true of firearms, and that's why it's an extra hassle to legally own a machine gun.
A machine gun absolutely will make a whole lot more stuff more dead than a sporting rifle. Let's not be absurd.
There is a reason that all modern armies use assault rifles and not snipers as their main infantry weapons. Its about the fire power not the aimed shot.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 26, 2025, 3:42 am
Thread Rating:
Busted with arms, researched killing Biden
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)