RE: Evangelicals, Trump and a Quick Bible Study
October 27, 2020 at 12:41 pm
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2020 at 12:46 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
It's a hypothesis about how a literary tradition developed, not who said what to whom. It very much -is- the assertion of the markan two source hypothesis that mark was first, matthew depended on mark and added a few things, and luke depended on them both and added a few things.
The adding a few things, in both instances, is a Q or source candidate.
An interesting wrinkle, though, is that the author of luke contends to have been unware of any written gospels (but does appear to have written much of acts).
The adding a few things, in both instances, is a Q or source candidate.
An interesting wrinkle, though, is that the author of luke contends to have been unware of any written gospels (but does appear to have written much of acts).
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
