(June 27, 2021 at 1:36 pm)Frank Apisa Wrote:(June 27, 2021 at 1:31 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Correct. And just so we’re clear, I wasn’t speaking about what “American law” declares. I’m referring to whether or not the jurors have to think the defendant is innocent if they don’t think he’s guilty. You and I seem to agree on this point, so then it shouldn’t be a stretch for you to imagine this analogous to my position regarding god-claims. Someone says “a god exists,” and my position is, “I have no good reason or evidence to accept that claim as true, so I don’t accept it as true.” That doesn’t mean I’m certain it’s false.Absolutely, with no doubt whatever...it does not mean that you think it is false.
In no way whatsoever does doubting a claim that there is a god...means that the person is saying that there are no gods...or that the claim is false.
So what?
So, why are you here telling a bunch of people who have just explained the above to you as their position on the existence of god/s, that their position is not, in fact, their actual position?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
