RE: Christianity is heading for a full allegorization
January 13, 2022 at 1:12 am
(This post was last modified: January 13, 2022 at 1:51 am by vulcanlogician.)
(January 6, 2022 at 11:20 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:(January 5, 2022 at 10:30 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: "Infallible" is the real problem here. It tends to suggest "can not be questioned"... "is perfect"... "is better than anything you might think."
I have long thought that Christianity would be much less poisonous and evil without the concept of biblical inerrancy. It's a kind of decent religion without all that. But alas....
infallible is not the problems. that salvation is needed if you know what’s good for you and there is a christ outside of which is no salvation is the problem. if you embrace that, accepting infallibility seems like just the sensibly conservative bet regardless of whether on any particular issue there is doubt.
So if christianity were to make christianity appreciably less noxious, it must renounce it’s own necessity by renouncing the necessity of christ.
By "decent religion" I just meant that it is a good collection of symbols. Like Greek Mythology. How many of us have referred to "the fates" or "the muses" to describe various things? Are any of us under the impression that these immortal entities exist? No. That's what full allegorization would entail. To allow us to simply refer to the symbol... "crown of thorns"... "prodigal son" etc. without the baggage of literal belief.
Without literal belief, it's hard for any religion to be noxious at all.