THE Gun Thread

[onlinebiker]

Yes. The FBI saying the gun could NOT have fired without the trigger being deliberately pulled. Baldwin said his finger wasn't even on the trigger and the gun 'just went off'. That's a blatant lie, and he knows it's a blatant lie. He's handled prop guns dozens of times in his career, not one of them has just gone off.

My guess (and it's ONLY a guess) is that he was arsing about, with tragic consequences.

Boru

Again - the gun in question was NOT a prop gun. It was a real gun. The manufacturer does not produce a prop gun in 45 colt - the round that was fired.

I explained early in this.thread why the gun could not fire wthout the trigger being pulled - and it breaks down to simple mechanical physics.

The naysayers who are "not convinced" are willing to ignore physics because it doesn' t fit their narrative.

Because they are cunts.

As far as Baldwin lying - I don' t think he is KNOWINGLY lying. He probably believes it.

I had an incident that happen at a firing range years ago. A friend of mine had a squib round fire in a 1911. This means a bullet was lodged in the barrel. I managed to verbally stop him from recycling and firing the gun. It would have blown up in his hand.

My friend was trained - State Department - has been around guns his whole life - and was sure he had just forgot to chamber a round. He did not hear the "pffft" sound of the squib - even though he pulled the trigger.

Memory is a funny thing.