(August 15, 2022 at 5:16 am)onlinebiker Wrote:(August 15, 2022 at 4:07 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Yes. The FBI saying the gun could NOT have fired without the trigger being deliberately pulled. Baldwin said his finger wasn't even on the trigger and the gun 'just went off'. That's a blatant lie, and he knows it's a blatant lie. He's handled prop guns dozens of times in his career, not one of them has just gone off.
My guess (and it's ONLY a guess) is that he was arsing about, with tragic consequences.
Boru
Again - the gun in question was NOT a prop gun. It was a real gun. The manufacturer does not produce a prop gun in 45 colt - the round that was fired.
I explained early in this.thread why the gun could not fire wthout the trigger being pulled - and it breaks down to simple mechanical physics.
The naysayers who are "not convinced" are willing to ignore physics because it doesn' t fit their narrative.
Because they are cunts.
Prop guns frequently ARE real guns. A fully functional firearm used in a film is a prop, by definition.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prop_gun
Quote:A prop gun is a gun or gun replicathat is used primarily by movie and television productions or in theatreperformances. As a prop, these guns can be divided into non-firing guns (replicas) and firing guns (firearms). are subject to restriction by law and safety regulations in use, due to their inherent danger.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
