1. No I'm not going to engage in a pointless game semantics with you IA
2.No unconscious decision does not rule out free will in any way shape or form as Chomsky points out.
3. I have no idea why you're bringing up John Conway...
4. Hitchens's political positions are irrelevant to this subject and Harris has defended both America's Surveillance state and American Imperialism
5. Sam Harris may be a neuroscientist but that doesn't alter the fact he's wrong and has been widely criticized for his terrible understanding of the freewill debate and his own relationship to it. So I'll go with Hitchens on this one
Epic fail on all points IA
2.No unconscious decision does not rule out free will in any way shape or form as Chomsky points out.
3. I have no idea why you're bringing up John Conway...
4. Hitchens's political positions are irrelevant to this subject and Harris has defended both America's Surveillance state and American Imperialism
5. Sam Harris may be a neuroscientist but that doesn't alter the fact he's wrong and has been widely criticized for his terrible understanding of the freewill debate and his own relationship to it. So I'll go with Hitchens on this one
Epic fail on all points IA
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM