I don't think it's wordplay at all... but each to their own. I still find pz's intuitively conceivable, albeit not being as committed to the idea as I have been in the past. They lead to some paradoxes, though, for me, so that sometimes suggests that an idea is incoherent or badly framed... and therefore probably not conceivable in the strictest sense of the word. But for me, my own paradoxes are very hard to put into words, suggesting to me they're more semantic than logical. So yeah, it's one big clusterfuck thinking about all this I find 
But if you believe epiphenomenalism is a possibility - as has always been, at least in the past, my default position - I think the possibility/conceivability of pz's naturally follows from that, at least intuitively if not coherently.(jury's still out on its coherency I think, for many people, me included).
But if you believe epiphenomenalism is a possibility - as has always been, at least in the past, my default position - I think the possibility/conceivability of pz's naturally follows from that, at least intuitively if not coherently.(jury's still out on its coherency I think, for many people, me included).
