RE: Philosophy Versus Science
August 23, 2025 at 2:02 pm
(This post was last modified: August 23, 2025 at 2:04 pm by Sheldon.)
So far he's offered subjective opinions about what kind of films he likes, facile scenarios about why a car park might be full, and a string of straw men fallacies.
Now I'm a gambling man by nature, and so I am prepared to bet 20 pounds sterling, he can't ever offer an example of "evidence" that is outside of the remit of science, or (he missed the word or entirely the first time I asked my question) the natural realm.
"Or", he will violate the word evidence like a "drag queen at a tractor pull".
Which of course is exactly what he did.
Wet shoes is "evidence" an angel has cried on your feet etc etc etc...
Is that outside of the remit of science? Well fuck me it is, so that's the standard of "evidence" he is decrying people for not investing belief in.
Now I'm a gambling man by nature, and so I am prepared to bet 20 pounds sterling, he can't ever offer an example of "evidence" that is outside of the remit of science, or (he missed the word or entirely the first time I asked my question) the natural realm.
"Or", he will violate the word evidence like a "drag queen at a tractor pull".
Which of course is exactly what he did.
Wet shoes is "evidence" an angel has cried on your feet etc etc etc...
Is that outside of the remit of science? Well fuck me it is, so that's the standard of "evidence" he is decrying people for not investing belief in.
