A Philosophy of War and Conflict

[Angrboda]

There's an interesting conundrum here. Spirituality, as you have defined it, is not in the business of providing reliable conclusions based upon reason and justification. You argue that the processes of reason which can provide reliable and justifiable conclusions are mute on the subject of spirituality. So reason cannot provide an form of appeal that establishes that your spirituality is related to truth. And your spirituality can't provide it, because, being mute on the means and methods of establishing what is true, it cannot speak on its own behalf. So you have an intractable problem, namely how do you establish that your spirituality is a form of truth? And the answer is literally that you can't get there from here. You've painted yourself into a corner from which there is no escape, and you are too ineffectual and clueless to realize it.