(September 29, 2008 at 12:13 pm)Giff Wrote: There is no God. There are no proof, there are of course proof that say that there are no God but that doesnt say that a god exists.
Like Dawkins said about the tea pot orbiting around the sun. No one can proof that it is there, it´s too small to be detected by a telescope but for the same reason you cant say it isnt there.
If there is a proof that say that there is no God is simply by looking around in the world, for example wars and that people who belive in other religions like Hinduism and Buddhism dont have it worse then christians. By just looking in the bible you can see lot of things that we know is incorrect. For example that world is not 6000 years old it is bilions of years old and so on
The purpose of my thread is exactly targeted to what you say together with the "almost" disprove of God by RD.
The best proof agaist the existence of God is ,in my opinion, the undeniable fact that he is a creation of man in his own human image and not the other way around as written in the Bible.
Most of the scientific diprovals of God are imperfect because our knowledge of nature is only a link in the evolutionary chain same as we humans are .
The pot example means just that.
To present inexplicit phenomenon of nature, as RD does, under the title of the "anthropometric principle" is just an elegant mode of accepting failure.
So what it remains provable und undeniable is the creation of God by Man and the understanding for what purposes he did it in ancient time as well(and that is important)the recurent creation of him the very moment he things about him.
