RE: God does not love you...
May 10, 2012 at 8:42 am
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2012 at 8:45 am by Drich.)
(May 10, 2012 at 12:37 am)Epimethean Wrote:Quote:And ten pages in, there is no compelling argument that agape is different from philia.Except that what is found in Koine Greek to english lexicons (4 of them to be precise.)
[quote='gringoperry' pid='283807' dateline='1336627128']
My argument is juvenile, in the face of arguments which rely on faith as their basis. Let me just elaborate on my argument, it's very simple. You prove that God exists, then you can interpret what the words in his holy book mean. Surely the being comes before his words? So, surely it is not unreasonable of me to ask for proof of the existence of the very source of the words that you are relying on, in your opening post. Without that source you are only arguing semantics in a book, written by ancient men, for no other reason than that they didn't understand the world around them.
Ok then please eloborate on what "proof" would be sufficient for you.
