RE: Proof of existence of God
May 15, 2012 at 1:06 pm
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2012 at 1:07 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(May 12, 2012 at 5:57 am)apophenia Wrote: But he missteps by slipping in the assumption that the human designer is not himself a natural process or the result of natural processes [i.e. evolution, rather than God].Of course this raises all the associated issues related to philosophy of mind, i.e. that intelligence, self-awareness, and sentience are all part's of a physical causal. Well, beyond the scope of this thread, but something to ponder.