All I saw in your argument is fallacies. Like - the argument from ignorance, special pleading and god of the gaps argument.
Simply terrible.
Let me guess? Goddidit? A does not prove B without first proving A. In other words, you must first demonstrate that a god exists before you can apply 'god' as the cause. Goddidit is a non-answer.
Might as well state that pixies did it. Same useless answer.
Simply terrible.
Quote:1.Whatever begins to exist has a causeNot everything that exists requires a cause.
Quote:2.The universe began to exist.Argument from ignorance.
3.Therefore, the universe has a cause.
Let me guess? Goddidit? A does not prove B without first proving A. In other words, you must first demonstrate that a god exists before you can apply 'god' as the cause. Goddidit is a non-answer.
Might as well state that pixies did it. Same useless answer.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
