RE: The debate is over
July 4, 2012 at 6:39 pm
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2012 at 6:47 pm by Taqiyya Mockingbird.)
(July 4, 2012 at 11:17 am)CliveStaples Wrote:(July 4, 2012 at 10:37 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: You seriously believe that reading more commentaries to your superstitious fairy tales is going to somehow make them any less of fairy tales?
LMAO
You seriously believe that reading philosophy that you are inclined to disagree with is pointless?
What you call philosophy, I call masturbation.
Quote:You seriously believe that calling a set of beliefs "fairy tales" is meaningful, when you aren't even aware of what that set of beliefs is?
Awful presumptuous of you, Miss Priss.
Quote:It's as though you think there's a slick proof that every belief system that implements theism must be ridiculous. If there is one, can you point me to it?
U mad, sis?
yeh u mad.
Quote: That is, if theism is to have importance, it can't be because it's really just a subset of science. Otherwise, it's really just undiscovered science. If it's going to truly be important, and important in the way that theists generally believe that it's important,…
LMAO the ingrate comes to an atheist forum braying about "if theism is to have importance..."
Theism is festering and dying. The world will be a far better place once it finally crawls into a foetid cesspool and dies the miserable death it deserves.
