Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: The debate is over
July 4, 2012 at 6:37 pm
In memory of fr0d0s intellectual honesty, cruely smothered at birth before it had any chance to develop.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 523
Threads: 1
Joined: May 22, 2012
Reputation:
9
RE: The debate is over
July 4, 2012 at 6:39 pm
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2012 at 6:47 pm by Taqiyya Mockingbird.)
(July 4, 2012 at 11:17 am)CliveStaples Wrote: (July 4, 2012 at 10:37 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: You seriously believe that reading more commentaries to your superstitious fairy tales is going to somehow make them any less of fairy tales?
LMAO
You seriously believe that reading philosophy that you are inclined to disagree with is pointless?
What you call philosophy, I call masturbation.
Quote:You seriously believe that calling a set of beliefs "fairy tales" is meaningful, when you aren't even aware of what that set of beliefs is?
Awful presumptuous of you, Miss Priss.
Quote:It's as though you think there's a slick proof that every belief system that implements theism must be ridiculous. If there is one, can you point me to it?
U mad, sis?
yeh u mad.
Quote: That is, if theism is to have importance, it can't be because it's really just a subset of science. Otherwise, it's really just undiscovered science. If it's going to truly be important, and important in the way that theists generally believe that it's important,…
LMAO the ingrate comes to an atheist forum braying about "if theism is to have importance..."
Theism is festering and dying. The world will be a far better place once it finally crawls into a foetid cesspool and dies the miserable death it deserves.
Posts: 1473
Threads: 20
Joined: November 12, 2011
Reputation:
26
RE: The debate is over
July 4, 2012 at 8:40 pm
I'm beginning to think that Frodo is an atheist pretending to be a theist - it's all a joke and we all got framed.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: The debate is over
July 4, 2012 at 9:24 pm
(July 4, 2012 at 8:40 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: I'm beginning to think that Frodo is an atheist pretending to be a theist - it's all a joke and we all got framed.
Your signature says it all.
Been meaning to ask by the way, how the hell did you get him to say that?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 4234
Threads: 42
Joined: June 7, 2011
Reputation:
33
RE: The debate is over
July 4, 2012 at 9:57 pm
Fr0d0 is devious and very sideways, but he'll come clean now and again.
Trying to update my sig ...
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: The debate is over
July 5, 2012 at 3:07 am
(This post was last modified: July 5, 2012 at 3:45 am by fr0d0.)
(July 4, 2012 at 6:37 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: In memory of fr0d0s intellectual honesty, cruely smothered at birth before it had any chance to develop. This is the danger with this subject isn't it. It's too easy to be so dissmissive as to loose respect that another person might have a different POV to yourself. The biggest man allows for it. Most people go to war.
Really, Norfolk should add an explanation that he quotes me out if context in his sig. But I guess he's so used to doing the same with the bible that he doesn't realise that he's doing it
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: The debate is over
July 5, 2012 at 6:38 am
(July 5, 2012 at 3:07 am)fr0d0 Wrote: (July 4, 2012 at 6:37 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: In memory of fr0d0s intellectual honesty, cruely smothered at birth before it had any chance to develop. This is the danger with this subject isn't it. It's too easy to be so dissmissive as to loose respect that another person might have a different POV to yourself. The biggest man allows for it. Most people go to war.
Really, Norfolk should add an explanation that he quotes me out if context in his sig. But I guess he's so used to doing the same with the bible that he doesn't realise that he's doing it
You have yet to answer my original question Frods.
Exactly what aspects of religion is Dawkins ignorant of?
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 523
Threads: 1
Joined: May 22, 2012
Reputation:
9
RE: The debate is over
July 5, 2012 at 8:15 am
(July 5, 2012 at 3:07 am)fr0d0 Wrote: (July 4, 2012 at 6:37 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: In memory of fr0d0s intellectual honesty, cruely smothered at birth before it had any chance to develop. This is the danger with this subject isn't it. It's too easy to be so dissmissive as to loose respect that another person might have a different POV to yourself. The biggest man allows for it. Most people go to war.
It's the hazards of being an intellectually dishonest, disingenuous troll. People will quickly see you for what you are, and treat you accordingly.
I love it when trolls whine. It lets us know just how badly you've been pwned.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: The debate is over
July 5, 2012 at 1:50 pm
(July 5, 2012 at 6:38 am)Zen Badger Wrote: You have yet to answer my original question Frods.
Exactly what aspects of religion is Dawkins ignorant of? Apologies Zen
All aspects except the superficial level that a child might understand. He references equally naive sources. Watch him against serious opposition and you'll see him acknowledge them. His child like fixations get him fame and fortune. He'd be killing the cash cow. I wish he chose integrity instead.
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: The debate is over
July 5, 2012 at 3:02 pm
(July 5, 2012 at 3:07 am)fr0d0 Wrote: This is the danger with this subject isn't it. It's too easy to be so dissmissive as to loose respect that another person might have a different POV to yourself. The biggest man allows for it. Most people go to war.
I wasn't aware there was anything that required dismissing. Could you point me to anything in your argument thats substantial? I fail to see anything here that isn't you simply attempting to undermine your opponents with crass insults.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
|