RE: What do you know about God and afterlife?
July 17, 2012 at 4:20 pm
(This post was last modified: July 17, 2012 at 4:21 pm by jonb.)
(July 17, 2012 at 3:44 pm)FemmeReasonAndLogic Wrote: Ah, but I did not. Whenever I am presented with a new idea, I argue in and against its case to myself to determine whether I do or do not agree with it. If I find it illogical, then yes, I dispel it. Going with your theory on eating, when you intake food, your body welcomes the nourishment and dispels the waste, then transports the nourishment to the various cells of your body that would require substanence, yes? This sets the concept of eating apart from interchanging atoms, as your body readily takes in food, which has been reduced to a liquid in your digestive tract, while the atoms in two solids are charged to reject and repel each other. Absorbing substances through your skin is done by a liquid or gasous fluid invading your pores and thusly entering your body, hence both actions are different from the process of interchanging atoms between solids. The policemen had a justifiable theory, but after examining it I nust say that I do not agree.
I'm not trying to sound pretentious, this is just how I think about things.
But liquid and gas are made of atoms. Whatever the method is, we are constantly interchanging atoms all the time. Every policeman knows how you leave parts of yourself everywhere you go. Fingerprints for instance which are residues of skin and bodily fluids, i.e. your atoms.
ps I like your thinking.