RE: Should Islam be given more credit...
September 8, 2012 at 7:58 pm
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2012 at 7:58 pm by cratehorus.)
(September 8, 2012 at 9:58 am)Sami_23 Wrote: People have tried to take credit away from the Muslims by saying Hindus were the one who made it and also claiming it's a Hindu temple. These have been proven to be a hoax, thankfully.who said this?
Quote:In my opinion, it should be known as an Islamic architecture.I thought it was?
Quote: Even Sheila S. Blair and Jonathan M. Bloom agree to that in their book 'The Art and Architecture of Islam (1994)'. There are more authors who agree to the fact that it should be known as an Islamic architecture.that's because.... it is?
Quote:So my question is, should celebrities/visitors be told that it's a religious palace rather than a historical palace? There is much more to the Taj Mahal than a man building it for his wife. It's a religious palace (infleunced by Islam) IMO.isn't historical better than religous?
I'm confused..... what is the question?
