(September 17, 2012 at 10:23 am)TaraJo Wrote:(September 17, 2012 at 10:12 am)greneknight Wrote: Hi Tarajo,
I don't think it can be a marriage. The law calls it a "civil partnership". The word "marriage" has too much of the religious "holy matrimony" idea to it, I think. I'm all for civil partnership for gays and lesbians. It's only fair that they have full recognition of their relationship. Why should we prevent them from having a partnership? What blooming right have we got to do that?
If marriage, at heart, is a religious ceremony, why does the government perform marriages? There should be a separation between church and state and that separation can't exist if people are performing religious ceremonies to gain state rights.
We are in different countries. There's no separation of State and Church in my country. My church is called the Established Church because it's the state church.