RE: Why does God hate babies who have not sinned?
October 11, 2012 at 3:36 pm
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2012 at 4:16 pm by Doubting_Thomas.)
(October 11, 2012 at 3:31 pm)Godschild Wrote:Minimalist already did. 2 Samuel 12.(October 11, 2012 at 12:38 am)cato123 Wrote: Your superiour scriptural knowledge should lead us all to the fact that your god doesn't give a fuck about a child until 'he' is at least one month old.
Care to swap book, chapter and verse regarding this one month prohibition of your god's love (babies and all)? Or will you just tell me to 'study' more after I again shove your own book up your sanctimonious ass?
Supply your book, chapter and verse.
BTW, "chapter and verse" depends on which version of the bible you use. Chapter and verse references were added after the original writing.
(October 11, 2012 at 1:57 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Not so sure. Gnosticism is a bit more abstract and intellectual than mainstream Christianity I think, just as crazy if not more whacko than the boring post-council-of-Trent stuff. Like "You will in your life experience many genesis/creations". So they are even further from reasoning also, it kinda has the appeal that mystical eastern traditions do for hippy westerners - I wouldn't be surprised if there are soon new-age Christian conmen preachers capitalising on it, especially after Dan Brown got in on the conspiracy theory side of it.(October 11, 2012 at 12:49 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: Um, Gospel of Philip isn't canonical.
Probably its biggest plus....especially when you compare it to the canonical shit.
(October 11, 2012 at 1:47 pm)Godschild Wrote: Seems your fellow nonbelievers know more than you do, maybe you should confer with them from time to time.They possibly do, but what makes you say that with regards to the gospel of Philip? What was the founders of the SBC view on the gospel of Philip?
blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” – John 20:26-29