I just picked up on this line of chippy's...talking about Tacitus' alleged reporting on his godboy.
What I wonder is, if this "practice" was so "usual" how come his fucking gospels don't include it with their resurrection horseshit? Talk about accounts that have not been "confirmed."
Quote:The only good argument I've heard for this one is that he could have been reporting hearsay rather than fact. If that were the case, however, it would have his usual disclaimer of "these accounts have not been confirmed."
What I wonder is, if this "practice" was so "usual" how come his fucking gospels don't include it with their resurrection horseshit? Talk about accounts that have not been "confirmed."