RE: Another gun thread...
December 21, 2012 at 11:05 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2012 at 11:08 pm by Shell B.)
Wait, why would the, "So you can protect yourself from the government 'crap" be your government telling you so? Just because the law also happens to say that doesn't make it crap or less valid of a reason. When was the last time England had to arm itself against the ruling class? Well, the answer to that question may be why you feel so compliant. As for the U.S., the country is only old enough that you could virtually be the great granddaughter of someone who was alive during the American Revolution. That is not a long time. During that time, we have had to fight Britain twice with militia, fight a faction of the government that went rogue, almost had to deal with an army an ex Vice President was planning, etc. It is a valid and logical reason, no matter how you look at it. So is gun regulation. Not elimination. Regulation.
Yes, that is exactly how to change the world -- send information to random politicians that they are already have.
Why do you think they shouldn't be? If it is death and violence, then why do you think sharp objects, chemicals, etc. should be legal and not guns?
(December 21, 2012 at 10:46 pm)Brian37 Wrote: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/loca...le-667321/
No, we don't need more threads about guns. We need to send all the stories about gun death to washington.
Yes, that is exactly how to change the world -- send information to random politicians that they are already have.
(December 21, 2012 at 12:22 pm)Napoléon Wrote: I haven't seen anyone give a real reason as to why they think they should be entitled to bear arms, as was asked in the OP. Just plenty of people saying they 'think' they should be.
Well, I'll ask again. Why do people think that?
Why do you think they shouldn't be? If it is death and violence, then why do you think sharp objects, chemicals, etc. should be legal and not guns?
