Oh, I don't disagree with inaccuracies... that's why we use statistics: to get the best idea. However, measuring the same thing over and over again doesn't change its weight any more than looking at it over and over again. 
Or I could just perfectly measure it the first time
The sword itself weighs a set amount depending on where it is... and unless we get mind-boggelingly lucky (see http://www.stonemakerargument.com/2.html ): all of our inaccuracies are our own fault. The sword has a certain length, width, weight, shyinyness, whatever... but it is in measuring it that we encounter problems.
See, A = A, but we might think A = B because of an inaccuracy, misinterpretation, etc.
Or I could just perfectly measure it the first time
The sword itself weighs a set amount depending on where it is... and unless we get mind-boggelingly lucky (see http://www.stonemakerargument.com/2.html ): all of our inaccuracies are our own fault. The sword has a certain length, width, weight, shyinyness, whatever... but it is in measuring it that we encounter problems.See, A = A, but we might think A = B because of an inaccuracy, misinterpretation, etc.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
