(February 12, 2013 at 7:01 pm)John V Wrote: Yes, I'd say that 10% takes those things into account. Are you taking into account younger start to childbearing and lack of modern contraception?
You'd say, or you know? Because what you want to believe, and what can actually be proven are two different things. You gotta do the math, if you're going to make claims like that.
Now, I could continue here, adding that you're probably not taking into account the number of people who die in childbirth before reliable medical care, but that would just be foolish. It'd be foolish, because you still can't get a stable gene pool from the offspring of just two people to begin with. Start there, since it's the foundation of your premise. I refuse to take the rest of it on faith until the baseline can be established.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!


