No copies of the proposed Q (Quelle) source exist, but by definition it is that text common to both Matthew and Luke and non-existent in Mark.
https://www.tonyburke.ca/wp-content/uplo...Q-Text.pdf
The Two-Source Hypthothesis
|
No copies of the proposed Q (Quelle) source exist, but by definition it is that text common to both Matthew and Luke and non-existent in Mark. https://www.tonyburke.ca/wp-content/uplo...Q-Text.pdf
Most NT scholars assume (for good reasons) there was a Q source.
(September 4, 2023 at 8:51 am)FrustratedFool Wrote: Most NT scholars assume (for good reasons) there was a Q source. One good reason is that Mark has Jesus "predicting" the Romans would set up an idol in the temple just like Antiochus IV Epiphanes did, but instead they went oopsie and burnt the temple to the ground, so Luke had Jesus "predicting" the Romans would lay siege to Jerusalem and nothing about an idol. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|