(February 13, 2013 at 2:40 pm)Chuck Wrote:(February 13, 2013 at 2:37 pm)Drich Wrote: Do you want to know why your arguement here fails? You must first establish God can not work through any other means than the supernatural, and even then 'technology' can technically be considered 'supernatural.' 2a : departing from what is usual or normal especially so as to appear to transcend the laws of nature
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/supernatural
Gooluck with that..
Fuck off, prove a god exist before rambling on about how he might be able to act.
Isn't that what your doing?You don't believe in God, yet you are speaking to his nature. Then you have the gall to tell me to 'prove to you' that God exists, even though you have already made the assumption that he does. Otherwise how can you possiably speak definativly about a nature of being that does not exist?
