RE: "Religion of Peace" - My Ass!
March 4, 2013 at 5:20 am
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2013 at 5:34 am by Muslim Scholar.)
(March 4, 2013 at 4:05 am)EGross Wrote: It's more of a disprove than a prove, isn't it? Or maybe a combination of the two.Good point as well
The statement of accepting islam starts with denying not accepting
"There is no God"
then
"But Allah"
So it is about disproving other Gods, then Proving Allah
(March 4, 2013 at 3:30 am)EGross Wrote: Religion is about oppression, forcing people into a specific structure with a heirarcy setting requirements. And it's about power and growth. You cannot grow a religion by giving more freedoms, only by suppressing them and getting internal agreement. Suppress the rights of women and get the men to go along with it, since it is to their advantage. Suppress the rights of the next group and the next, getting internal support for this.Yes, who said that religion is about freedom
We are slaves not free people
It seems that your problem is not about proofs it is about accepting the concepts of Worshiping itself
Let me give you an example to clarify the situation
You own a company and you have employees
They work for the benefit of the company
There are three people A, B, C
A: he is very clever and working very hard for your company
B: Is not so clever but trying his best
C: is very clever but playing Golf at time of work
A you will give him salary + Bonus
B you will give him just his salary
C you will punish or fire him
Quote:No one is born with special rights. Talent is one thing, rights is another. A child raised as a Muslim gets no more reward at the end than one born as a Catholic, despite that both are brainwashed into believing otherwise. And one is no more special than the other by right of birth.This is something you cannot prove or disprove (it is valid or invalid depending on the realm of religions)
You statement makes no sense at all.
