RE: Do you think "necrophilia" can be considered a legit sexual orientation?
March 27, 2013 at 7:21 pm
Quote:tw I am not a "pedophile", and I also don't support raping kids...but I don't think we should look down on people who are attracted to younglings. Not every pedophile is a child molester - but also, not every child molester is a pedophile.
...See my post [here] for just what I think about what you just said. Nice way to ensure that your future on this forum will be spent with my constant, infinite contempt, disrespect, and possibly even outright hostility directed your way.
(March 27, 2013 at 11:42 am)catfish Wrote: Does the APA have anything besides anecdotal evidence? A blood test? Perhaps an MRI or some other imaging device?
Ohh wow...
![[Image: picard-facepalm.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=hotnerdgirl.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2Fpicard-facepalm.jpg)
They just mentioned testing fucking DNA. The coding and framework of what and who we are, they look into it and seek out specific markers and compare them to behavioral patterns [in this case sexual alignment]. That's not anecdotal. That's concrete. There's a reason DNA testing, when admissable in a court of law, is pretty much the trump card of any prosecution or defense; because it doesn't lie. It's like looking at a computer program's programming and being able to determine what functions do what: You look at DNA and you can be extremely positive of quite a bit regarding the programming of the individual before you as long as you compare what the programming tells you with the way the individual behaves. Repeated studies showing the same results over and over and over and over is EXTREMELY clear proof. How do you NOT get that? Are you just dense or something? Is being shown a pattern repeating 25+ times not enough to convince you? Do you also need an unsubstantiated holy book or something? Maybe a personal and unique gut feeling to really find it true?
If so your life must be unbelievably indecisive and empty.