RE: Do religious beliefs actually have any significant bearing on moral decision making?
April 15, 2013 at 9:50 am
(This post was last modified: April 15, 2013 at 9:50 am by pocaracas.)
(April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am)student1992 Wrote: Please - State your GenderMale, alpha!

(April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am)student1992 Wrote: The current educational level you are studying for or highest attained.PhD in.... let's call it science
(April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am)student1992 Wrote: Your religious beliefs(denomination of Christianity if applicable) / If not religious then whether atheist or agnosticAgnostic atheist, level 6 in Dawkins scale... interpret that as you wish...
(April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am)student1992 Wrote: How strong you consider these beliefs from 1-9 (9 highest)I don't believe.
(April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am)student1992 Wrote: Do your parents have any religious beliefs?yes, a bit...
(April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am)student1992 Wrote: To what extent do you think they influenced you morally? (1-9)My parents? a lot!
My parent's beliefs? very little if none.
(April 15, 2013 at 9:14 am)student1992 Wrote: To what extent do you agree with the following statements from 1-9 (9 completely agree)
"Different types of morality cannot be compared as to 'rightness.'
1.... meaning I don't understand the statement... I'd never make such a statement
Rigidly codifying an ethical position that prevents certain types of actions could stand in the way of better human relations and adjustment.
8
Whether a lie is judged to be moral or immoral depends upon the circumstances surrounding the action.
8
No rule concerning lying can be formulated; whether a lie is permissible or not permissible totally depends upon the situation.
8
What is ethical varies from one situation and society to another.
7... somethings, yes... others, no
If an action could harm an innocent other, then it should not be done.
8, shouldn't, but sometimes it's necessary
Deciding whether or not to perform an act by balancing the positive consequences of the act against the negative consequences of the act is immoral.
2, it is logical... the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few
Please answer yes or no to these situations.
1.You are standing on a bridge when an out-of-control mining cart comes into view. You can see 5 workers on the track who you suppose will be instantly killed unless you push a large rock off the bridge to stop the cart. However if you do this the cart driver will be killed. Do you push the rock?
Yes, split second decisions are crap, maybe the cart has no driver, I have shortsightedness
2.This time instead of a rock there is a large man you could push. He and the cart driver will die but 5 workers will survive. Do you push the man?
No, he's large, I'm not.... This wouldn't end well for me
3. In a separate instance you can throw yourself in front of the cart, killing you and the cart driver but 5 workers will survive. Do you jump?
No, I'd yell for the workers to get into cover... If there is anything I could do with a rock, or my own body, then sound could reach them much faster
leading to no loss of life
Please answer every question as it is part of my dissertation/thesis research. I will post the full data results afterwards. Please feel free to comment on any similar topics.
Enjoy.