RE: Are you for or against the separation of church and state?
April 18, 2013 at 3:05 pm
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2013 at 3:06 pm by smax.)
(April 18, 2013 at 7:27 am)Godschild Wrote: @ smax, Any of those people in the atrocities I mentioned were not religious people nor was religion a part of their governments. Many can hide behind the word religion, but that in no way means that any particular religion was responsible. FtR could kill 100 people in the name of smax, does that mean you had anything to do with giving him a reason to kill those people, he could of said smax the god of smaxism has given a decree these should die because they were unworthy of smax. Blame ie. guilt goes to the individuals, not their claims.
If I created a religion called smaxism, then your damn right I carry some responsibility for the actions of my followers.
And if someone else tried to create a religion based on me or my views, I would not only discourage such action, I would take action to stop it.
It's one thing to recognize good logical reason and leadership, but it's an entirely different, and far more dangerous thing, to worship those things or anything for that matter.
Religion is bad. Human beings, in general, are barely sane as it is. Giving them a good reason to take the plunge into insanity is a terribly bad idea, and the world's history is filled with proof.
Two rules, relating to this subject, that are very important to follow:
#1. Human beings should critically challenge any supernatural claims.
#2. Human beings should recognize the fact that all human beings are flawed and, therefore, require sound logic and reason to accompany leadership.
Ignoring either (and especially both) of these rules invites danger.