RE: How the Torah predicted the coming of Mohamed
May 6, 2013 at 7:43 pm
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2013 at 7:49 pm by A_Nony_Mouse.)
(May 6, 2013 at 2:20 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:(May 5, 2013 at 12:30 pm)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote: Views not in the Koran do not rise above popular opinion.It is a logical proof
That is not proof. Proof is only found in math and logic. Legal proof is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Where is your evidence that is beyond a reasonable doubt? Even relaxing the standard to preponderance of the evidence as in civil cases believers do not even come close.
and till now nobody was able to refute it.
If your claims rest upon what I remember reading lots of people did and your response did not rise above, No it's not!
Do not forget
Views not in the Koran do not rise above popular opinion.
(May 5, 2013 at 8:53 am)festive1 Wrote: So... In your latest thread you clearly assert that the bible cannot be trusted. Doesn't that negate any support of Islam derived from the Torah or the Old Testament? It seems to me you enjoy shooting your own cause in the foot...The Quran is not derived
It is revealed from God to Mohamed
For which you provide no physical evidence.
Quote:But as he is the same God of the jews and Christians, it is very similar to the original Judaism or Christianity
And of course the Jewish kingdoms around Mecca and Medina were unknown to him even he wrote of them.
(May 6, 2013 at 2:51 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:(May 6, 2013 at 2:45 am)Dragonetti Wrote: Time did not exist before the Big Bang. How can a super natural being exist before time? Nothing can exist before time.This is false
Read some Steven Hawkings please!
Science only analyze the universe not what is outside it
Yet some crackpot in a cave around Medina was told by an unknown entity what it was like.
Quote:Logic is much more powerful than science, my proof proved that something outside the universe must have started it
That is sort of a classic statement made by people who do not and cannot understand science.
Quote:The definition of time is not very clear to be used here.
Then eternity is out the window also.
Quote:
This is was found in an early version of the Orthodox bible then was omitted later!
How does a crackpot version of the bible support your claim whether or not the word is used?