The End Game of Atheism

[ShadowWolf1986]

Ah, one institute that man built is superior to the another one they built.

I suppose you don't see the irony in this, coming from someone who believes in a doctrine that wasn't satisfied with the original God so they had to pile on another one.

WARNING: Do not reflexively vomit up the idea of the trinity. If you do, I will happily reinsert it through another orifice.

I don't believe in the trinity. It is a false doctrine, read my introduction post. I am an Apostolic Christian, which means we are the original Church, even before the Catholics.

---

Several different people used several different ways to tell you that there was no end goal. They used different words in different orders to tell you the exact same thing. It's clearly not satisfying you, so now you're riling everyone up in order to get the effect you want.

You are wrong, someone posted something about eliminating religion as the end goal.

I didn't rile up anyone, you all did that on your own, but this always happens with Atheists. You can't remain calm.

---

"I never argued in favor of teaching religion over science. I don't see how one is superior to the other. They are both institutions that man built. You answered my question by poking fun at my 3000 year old book, that is apparently flawed because it is 3000 years old.

History repeats itself, therefore studying it can help us predict the future."

You don't see how one is superior to the other? One is useless today as it was written 3000 years ago, by morons. Its not useless because its 3000 years old. Its useless because of what it says.

History does repeat itself - but that has nothing to do with your Bible which is as vile a document as mankind has ever put together. The Bible is not history - do I need to repeat that?

That is your opinion.