(December 26, 2009 at 10:36 pm)Amphora Wrote:(December 26, 2009 at 7:06 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I'm totally open to any opinion. It is fact that the bible's purpose is not to present literal facts about history. What _is_ it's intent is theology. Yeah, if you suggest something else I'm afraid I've gotta pull out the joker card. How can't I? If I started quoting Lassie the dog on particle physics I'd hope that you would call me a twat.(December 26, 2009 at 9:51 pm)theVOID Wrote: You haven't shown being open at all, every time i've seen you talking about, like in the chat box with Amorpha for example, you came up with the exact same dismissive excuses you always do by claiming that her conclusion required more background knowledge.
Which conversation is this you are talking about theVoid? I feel lost in a sea of nothingness
The shout box a few days ago when you mentioned you were up to deuteronomy - Before you could even give your opinion fr0d0 was seeding the excuses with his same-old condescending 'it's complex and takes background info' disclaimers so whatever your conclusion he can claim you didn't read it like he did.
.
