(September 7, 2013 at 9:10 am)catfish Wrote: LOL, like a sock-puppeting, fallacious presuppositional using, faux Christian, chicken-ass run-away-from-a-challenge asswipe who believes in a sky-boogeyman has any type of a clue regarding credibility.Really? You still want to dredge that up and try to claim you won that exchange?
Are you still so sore over that ass-whipping I gave you? Remember that Magnificent 7 video? You're like that loudmouth who keeps crying, "C'mon, I won! Tell them I won!" Everyone keeps trying to tell him he lost but he just can't accept it.
You lost.
Badly.
And you look pathetic crying about it almost a year later.
And I wasn't exaggerating with my "back-handed compliment". I really do put Waldork head-and-shoulders above you. In fact, it's no contest.
Waldork is often like a clown with his presuppositionalism but at least I do find him challenging, even thought provoking, once in a great while. You on the other hand are a tiny bug that I never break a sweat over swatting. You've never offered anything of substance that I'm aware of. Frankly, I sometimes suspect you're just a troll.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
