(September 18, 2013 at 6:43 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: With such limitations, I must assume if all the scholarly translations, working independently come to the same conclusion, there's a reason.
*Takes note that DP values scholarly consensus when it is convenient to his position but not concerning the inconvenient reality of Christ’s existence.
Quote:Oxford seems convinced that Luke 1:5 is a reference to Herod the Great. Do you know any other scholars that cite a controversy here? If not, why do you think that is?
Oxford scholars agree that Jesus existed.
(September 18, 2013 at 6:48 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: You'll have to give me some time on the other thread. You've demanded that I repost a lot of information I already gave you in my YouTube video series that I referenced in my post.
I was not asking you. Secondly, I need primary sources, not homemade YouTube videos.