RE: Women's Rights and Religion
November 24, 2013 at 7:12 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2013 at 7:14 pm by FiniteImmortal.)
(November 24, 2013 at 2:19 pm)Bipolar Bob Wrote: I don't think there are any women's rights in any modern religion. From the misogyny of Buddhism to the the patriarchal culture of Christianity, women have had it pretty bad in most religions. In most religions, women are at the lowest rung in the totem pole.
Yet some religions insist that they give women proper respect and ensure her of rights such as when a Muslim insists that women have rights in Islam because women are allowed to inherit property or when Christians insist women have rights because the Bible allows her to have a job selling crafts.
Are these truly rights? If you were to loosen the chains of a slave, allowing that slave to walk 10 feet more are you really giving that slave rights?
A women or a man for that matter canonly truly be said to have rights when they have the right to determine their own destiny. I see none of that in the more patriarchal Abrahamic religions and I certainly do not see it in Buddhism or Hinduism either. In all these religions, men and women are bound to traditions and culture that saps them of the right to self-determination. Their roles as man and women have been predetermined by doctrine and enforced by clergy and layman alike.
How can anyone say that religion ensures that rights of anyone when religion predetermines your course of action, the thoughts you have and your ultimate destiny? It is impossible.
So to those of you who are religious, please show me how religion ensures rights for women or men. Because it seems to me the only thing religion ensures is the enslavement of both.
To respond to this topic, the need to define what a "right" is instantly arises. What is a right? The question you ask has an automatic implication that "rights" exist, and that they are a "good" thing. If rights exist, where do they come from? What makes is "wrong" to infringe upon a right? There is immediately the requirement to acknowledge that if there is such a thing an an absolute right, the concept of Absolute has to be real. If rights are "unalienable", they are given to us by our creator, the question is then, is our creator an infinite intelligence, or a product of the law of physics?
If rights aren't unalienable, and only granted in context of society and whatever group is in power, then we shouldn't use the word "right"; some other term would be way less confusing.
So, your question about Women having an "unalienable right" to do this or that has little bearing on an Atheist board. The question of Women having a "societal right" has much more relevance here, but not to me, because I don't worry about what is popular or currently voted on by the tribe as to what ought to be. The tribe will a way oppress someone, if no women are around, we will oppress each other in endless ways.
As to a non-moral framework lending Womenhood any reverence or esteem, that has to be done ad hock. There is no epistimilogical basis to do so. I don't see a rational way an atheistic framework can give essential worth to Womenhood or humanity at all. It is only in context of a transcendent framework that you can arrive at a "right" as in the classical definition, and was in fact at the core of the founder's worldview who penned the Constitution, which is a rule-set detailing what government can and can not infringe upon. The rights were always assumed to be unalienable.
So, in a purely material universe, a women is nothing more than a weaker-man, less hearty and emotionally driven, less adept at hunting and gathering, useful for her vagina and birthing abilities, with some pleasure mixed in for fun. There exists no provision for her in reality other than societal constructs to protect and cherish her. There exist nothing for any of us, for that matter, aside from being the fittest. It has been tried since the dawn of humanity, the only way to think correctly about ourselves and lead to an increase in happiness and individual liberty is to uphold a transcendent framework.
At the core of your question, there is the obvious objection to the mishandling of the the fairer sex over the centuries, which is human nature repeating itself. I know of NO other worldview in existence, other than Christianity, that lends the Majesty and Mystique to Womenhood that she deserves. A material universe gives her nothing. If there really isn't anything else, then fine. But, lets end the silly discussion of "rights".
"When the tide is low, every shrimp has its own puddle." - Vance Havner