(December 2, 2013 at 4:17 pm)Jacob(smooth) Wrote:(December 2, 2013 at 4:08 pm)Chas Wrote: So you're satisfied with rationalizations and wishful thinking. How very analytical.
Ask me a question about science, or medicine, I'll give you an analytical answer. Those are the areas where analytical is important, nay essential.
So far as a world view, individual morality, psychology and suchlike goes, I'm satisfied with functional. If analytical works well for you then give yourself a big hand. Woot for the more analytical than thou chas
Your weak attempt at sarcasm falls short. Clearly I am more analytical than you since I apply it consistently.
Carry on with your compartmentalization, cognitive dissonance, and delusion.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
