I don't like the Amazing Atheist, but it is primarily because 1) I am just not into his style of presentation and 2) I have become less interested in people who are clearly trying to be famous for the sake of it. Some people have something valuable to contribute to the discussion (tAA has at times had some good stuff to add), but in the realm of the atheist who is famous for being an atheist, they typically repeat themselves like a broken record. For instance, Hitch or Dawkins are great reads and fun to watch in debates, because they have other credentials to add to the discussion.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/FJovzGlbuoEXm/giphy.gif)