RE: Dennett throws down the gloves and pummels Sam Harris right in the gut
February 8, 2014 at 6:17 pm
(This post was last modified: February 8, 2014 at 6:20 pm by Chas.)
(February 2, 2014 at 4:17 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:(February 2, 2014 at 3:56 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I'm with Min on this, not dissing philosophy, but I prefer to waste my time on concrete shit. Masturbation is more than rubbing a penis or a clitoris.
I think it's important to have a well-articulated philosophical framework by which to interpret the observations I make, or rather, when I "waste my time on concrete shit." Without philosophy, there is no science.
Without science, philosophy is simply rhetoric.
(February 2, 2014 at 8:05 pm)houseofcantor Wrote:(February 2, 2014 at 4:30 pm)whateverist Wrote: From Dennett's response it is pretty clear to me that the cosmological brat is an intellectual lightweight outside his own specialty. That he could go off so half cocked on a topic he has given only superficial reflection is a tribute to his narcissism which obviously is second to none. Harris annoys me.
I thought the "cosmological brat" was Krause.
Nah, it's Krauss.
![[Image: coffeedrinker.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.acbeddoe.com%2Fphotos%2Fpublic%2Fcoffeedrinker.gif)
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.